Human enhancement futures · 20th-century roots; organized declarations since 1998

Transhumanism

Explores using science and technology to expand human capabilities and address aging, suffering, and biological limits. Its institutional declarations also recognize major risks and support deliberation about how technological change should be governed.

Reference boundary: Not measurable from the ten core axes. Direct enhancement questions are needed; technological optimism does not establish a specific view about genetic or cognitive intervention.

Foundational doctrines

Disagreement and variation

Enhancement can deepen unequal access, alter social expectations, or expose people to risks they did not choose. Libertarian, egalitarian, and other transhumanists disagree about ownership, distribution, regulation, and the meaning of a desirable future.

Source and historical context

Numerical positions in the interactive model are editorial reference estimates, not scientifically validated measurements.

Related traditions

Open the interactive profile